Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pompei Winery, Inc., v. Ohio Board of Liquor Control, 1958 — 356 U.S. 937 · caselaw · US
General
Pompei Winery, Inc., v. Ohio Board of Liquor Control
356 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 850.
Pompei Winery, Inc., v. Ohio Board of Liquor Control.
Frank V. Opaskar and Anthony R. Fiorette for petitioner.
William Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and S. Noel Melvin, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.