Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Shane, Respondent, v. National Biscuit Company, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 514 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
James Shane, Respondent, v. National Biscuit Company, Appellant
186 N.Y. 514·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Shane, Respondent, v. National Biscuit Company, Appellant.
Shane v. National Biscuit Co., 102 App. Div. 188, affirmed.
(Argued June 13, 1906;
decided October 2, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Coni’t in the fourth judicial department, entered March 18, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon .a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for pei'sonal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
F-ranle Gibbons and Harry A. Talbot for appellant.
Timothy G. Sheehan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Clx. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.