Contracts · MBE-tested
Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.
350 U.S. 1003100 L. Ed. 2d 866·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 2, 1956.
No. 66.
Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.
Maurice Rosenfield argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Philip B. Kurland and Jack H. Oppenheim. David A. Fox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gerrit P. Groen and Roger Sherman Hoar.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 350 U. S. 817, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Argued January 16, 1956. Decided April 2, 1956.
Per Curiam:
The Court is of the opinion that the District Court correctly found there was proper service upon the defendant in this case. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
As amended by order entered April 9, 1956, post, p. 1012.