Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dyer et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 803 · caselaw · US
Securities
Dyer et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.
361 U.S. 803·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 67,
October Term, 1958.
Dyer et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.,
J. Raymond Dyer for peti-tionersrinovants.
[MAJORITY]
359 U. S. 499. The motion to clarify the judgment is denied. The motion to -retax costs is granted. The judgment of this Court of May 18, 1959, is recalled and the Clerk is directed to incorporate therein a reassessment of the costs so as to provide'for the payment of one-half of the costs by the Union Electric Company.