General
Michael Agle, Respondent, v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, Appellant
178 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Agle, Respondent, v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, Appellant.
Agle v. Postal Telegra/ph-Cable Co., 84 App. Div. 632, affirmed.
(Argued May 9, 1904;
decided May 31, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 26, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Adelbert Moot and William W. Cooh for appellant.
Arthur E. Clarh for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Cli. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.