General
LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. THE Steam Tug WILLIAM A. JAMISON, Jay Street.Terminal, Claimant-Appellant, and THE Steam Tug TRANSFER NO. 18, New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Impleaded Claimant-Appellee
67 F.2d 1002·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. THE Steam Tug WILLIAM A. JAMISON, Jay Street.Terminal, Claimant-Appellant, and THE Steam Tug TRANSFER NO. 18, New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Impleaded Claimant-Appellee.
No. 76.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 18, 1933.
Courtland Palmer, of New York City (Francis J. Ryan, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Jay Street Terminal.
• Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauneey I. Clark and P. F. Shortridge, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Long Island R. Co.
Duncan & Mount, of New York City (H. W. Dieek, Jr., and Charles R. Millett, both of New York City, of counsel), for claimantappellee.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.