Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of Katharina Wohlgemuth et al., as Executors of Charles Wohlgemuth, Deceased, Respondents. Village of Seewen, Appellant, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 578 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of Katharina Wohlgemuth et al., as Executors of Charles Wohlgemuth, Deceased, Respondents. Village of Seewen, Appellant
184 N.Y. 578·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of Katharina Wohlgemuth et al., as Executors of Charles Wohlgemuth, Deceased, Respondents. Village of Seewen, Appellant.
Matter of Wohlgemuth, 110 App. Div. 644, affirmed.
(Argued March 2, 1906;
decided March 20, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 29, 1906, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the executors herein and directing distribution of the funds in their hands.
Lucius H. Beers and Darius E. Peck for appellant.
BLenry Meyer and Andrew 8. llamersley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.