Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McLeod, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S. A.; and National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S. A., 1962 — 371 U.S. 884 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
McLeod, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S. A.; and National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S. A.
371 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 91.
McLeod, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S. A.; and National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, v. Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S. A.
Lawrence Hunt on the motion.
No. 93.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 370 U. S. 915, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.