General
Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead et al.
309 U.S. 633·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 788.
Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead et al.
March 25, 1940.
Mr. Irving Ma-riash for appellant.
Mr. Franklin T. Voelker for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The. motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325; Lewis v. Mayor, 290 U. S. 585.