Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona v. California et al., 1961 — 368 U.S. 893 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Arizona v. California et al.
368 U.S. 893·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8,
Original.
Arizona v. California et al.
[For earlier orders herein, see 344 U. S. 806, 919; 345 U. S. 914, 968; 347 U. S. 985, 986; 348 U. S. 947; 350 U. S. 114, 812, 880, 955; 351 U. S. 977; 354 U. S. 918; 357 U. S. 902; 364 U. S. 940.]
[MAJORITY]
The joint request for allotment of and division of time for oral argument is approved. The case is set for argument on Monday, January 8, 1962, and a total of sixteen hours is allotted for that purpose to be apportioned as follows:
California. — Five and one-half hours for opening and rebuttal.
Arizona. — Five and one-half hours.
United States. — Three hours.
Nevada. — One and one-quarter hours.
Utah. — Fifteen minutes.
New Mexico. — Thirty minutes.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.