Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max Hoffman et al., Appellants, v. Isaac Steinau et al., Respondents, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
Max Hoffman et al., Appellants, v. Isaac Steinau et al., Respondents
108 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Hoffman et al., Appellants, v. Isaac Steinau et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 31, 1888;
decided February 28, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made February 18,1887, which reversed an order of Special Term, which denied a motion made by defendants for the repayment to them of moneys paid out for duties on the goods to recover possession •of which this action was brought.
Alex. BlumensUel for appellants.
It. S. N&weombe for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.