General
BENDER v. PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY
148 U.S. 50237 L. Ed. 537·Supreme Court of the United States·1893
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BENDER v. PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY.
ERROR TO THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.
No. 193.
Submitted March 29, 1893.
Decided April 3, 1893.
An order overruling a motion to remand a case to a State Court is not a final judgment.
Motion to dismiss: The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. J. R. Carey and Mr. F. J. Mullins for the motion.
Mr. Lyman R. Gritchjield, opposing.
[MAJORITY — The Chief Justice :]
The Chief Justice :
This is a writ of error, brought May 29, 1889, to an order overruling a motion to remand the case1 to the State Court. Such an order is not a'final judgment'on the merits, and the writ of error must be dismissed. ' McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Chicago, St. Paul &c. Railway v. Roberts, 141 U. S. 690; Joy v. Adelbert College, 146 U. S. 355.