Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward Cooper et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Peter Cooper, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 513 · caselaw · US
General
Edward Cooper et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Peter Cooper, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant
180 N.Y. 513·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Cooper et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Peter Cooper, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.
Cooper v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 93 App. Div. 612, affirmed.
(Argued December 1, 1904;
decided December 16, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 15, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Sherrill Babcock, Julien T. Drnies and Charles A. Gardiner for appellant.
William G. Peckham for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vañn, JJ.