Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rice et al. v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp. et al.; Rice et al. v. Board of Trade of Chicago; Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp. et al.; and Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Board of Trade of Chicago, 1947 — 330 U.S. 810 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Rice et al. v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp. et al.; Rice et al. v. Board of Trade of Chicago; Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp. et al.; and Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Board of Trade of Chicago
330 U.S. 810·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 470.
Rice et al. v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp. et al.; Rice et al. v. Board of Trade of Chicago; Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp. et al.; and Illinois Commerce Commission et al. v. Board of Trade of Chicago.
No. 471.
No. 472.
No. 473.
March 31, 1947.
[MAJORITY]
Counsel for the petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471 having suggested that one of the copartners of the firm of Daniel F. Rice & Co., to wit: Walter T. Rice, died on June 8, 1946, and that said firm has been reconstituted with the addition of Joseph A. Fagan as a partner and member thereof, it is ordered that the writs of certiorari be dismissed as to Walter T. Rice and that Joseph A. Fagan be, and he hereby is, made a party petitioner in Nos. 470 and 471. Counsel for the petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471 having further suggested that respondent Great Lakes Elevator Corporation has abandoned its service as a warehouse and public storer of grain for hire, it is ordered that the writs of certiorari in Nos. 470 and 472 be dismissed as to respondent Great Lakes Elevator Corporation.
Lee A. Freeman for petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471.