Contracts · MBE-tested
James Kearney, as Receiver of the Firm of Arthur McMullen & Company, Appellant, v. James S. Coleman et al., Surviving Members of the Firm of Coleman Ryan & Brown, Respondents
185 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Kearney, as Receiver of the Firm of Arthur McMullen & Company, Appellant, v. James S. Coleman et al., Surviving Members of the Firm of Coleman Ryan & Brown, Respondents.
Kearney v. Coleman, 105 App. Div. 638, affirmed.
(Argued June 7, 1906;
decided June 21, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 29,1995, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover an amount alleged to be due upon a contract.
Edwa/rd P. Mowton and John Mulholla/nd for appellant.
David Mo Glure for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray,. O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.