Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wooten v. Bomar, Warden; Williams v. Ragen, Warden; Moore v. Bannan, Warden; Sam v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Hicks v. Pepersack, Warden, et al.; Miller v. Taylor, Warden; and Way v. Settle, Warden, 1960 — 363 U.S. 835 · caselaw · US
General
Wooten v. Bomar, Warden; Williams v. Ragen, Warden; Moore v. Bannan, Warden; Sam v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Hicks v. Pepersack, Warden, et al.; Miller v. Taylor, Warden; and Way v. Settle, Warden
363 U.S. 835·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 755,
No. 933,
No. 944,
No. 980,
No. 1006,
No. 1020,
No. 1042,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Wooten v. Bomar, Warden; Williams v. Ragen, Warden; Moore v. Bannan, Warden; Sam v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary; Hicks v. Pepersack, Warden, et al.; Miller v. Taylor, Warden; and Way v. Settle, Warden.
Petitioners pro se. George F. McGanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Henry C. Foutch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 755, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.