General
In re ST. LOUIS CAN COMPANY, Debtor
73 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re ST. LOUIS CAN COMPANY, Debtor.
No. 10166.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Oct. 24, 1934.
On petition for allowance for appeal.
T. M. Pierce and Samuel II. Liberman, both of St. Louis, Mo., for St. Louis Can Co.
Williams, Nelson & English, Nagel, Kirby, Orrick & Shepley, Degen & Kramer, Irvin H. Gamble, and Fred J. West, all of St. Louis, Mo., for respondents.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition of St. Louis Can Company for appeal from United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, denied.