Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pete RAND, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1015 · caselaw · US
General
Pete RAND, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America
69 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Pete RAND, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 9892.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 17, 1934.
Charles W. Bowers, of Des Moines, Iowa, and William P. Welch, of Logan, Iowa, for appellant.
R. W. Colflesh, U. S. Atty., and Ray C. Fountain, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Des Moinos, Iowa, and Prank P. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Mt. Ayr, Iowa.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Cause remanded to District Court, with directions to vacate that part of judgment which sentences appellant and to dismiss indictment as to him.