Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oneida National Bank, Appellant, v. Edward H. Stokes et al., Respondents, 1872 — 49 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
Oneida National Bank, Appellant, v. Edward H. Stokes et al., Respondents
49 N.Y. 675·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Oneida National Bank, Appellant, v. Edward H. Stokes et al., Respondents.
(Argued May 21, 1872
decided May 28, 1872.)
G. S. P. Stillman and R. W. Peohha/rn, Jr., for the appellant.
Edmond Wetmore and B. E. Derwmg for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
Judgment affirmed with costs.