Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of John B. Webster, Appellant, for the Resubmission of Local Option Questions to the Electors of the Town of Hanover. The State Commissioner of Excise, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 536 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of John B. Webster, Appellant, for the Resubmission of Local Option Questions to the Electors of the Town of Hanover. The State Commissioner of Excise, Respondent
186 N.Y. 536·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of John B. Webster, Appellant, for the Resubmission of Local Option Questions to the Electors of the Town of Hanover. The State Commissioner of Excise, Respondent.
Matter of Webster, 113 App. Div.888, affirmed.
(Argued October 2, 1906;
decided October 16, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 2, 1906, which affirmed an order of the Chautauqua County Court denying the application herein.
F. G. Randall for appellant.
Daniel A. Reed and Royal R. Scott for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.