Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DuBose v. Craven, Warden, et al., 1973 — 409 U.S. 1130 · caselaw · US
General
DuBose v. Craven, Warden, et al.
409 U.S. 1130·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari, vacate judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to hold a hearing on petitioner’s claim.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 72-5099.
DuBose v. Craven, Warden, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari, vacate judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to hold a hearing on petitioner’s claim.