General
Pauling et al. v. McElroy, Secretary of Defense, et al.
364 U.S. 835·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 227.
Pauling et al. v. McElroy, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Francis Heisler, Charles A. Stewart, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander and John G. Laughlin, Jr. for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The motion to substitute Robert E. Wilson and Loren K. Olson in the place of H. S. Vance and John F. Floberg as parties respondent is granted. The motion to substitute Thomas E. Gates in the place of Neil H. McElroy as a party respondent is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.