Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Ashon, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al.; and Leong Mow, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al., 1913 — 229 U.S. 606 · caselaw · US
General
John Ashon, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al.; and Leong Mow, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al.
229 U.S. 606·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 276.
No. 277.
John Ashon, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al.; and Leong Mow, Appellant, v. The Conservation Commission of Louisiana et al.
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Argued for the appellees and submitted for the appellants May 2, 1913.
Decided May 5, 1913.
Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for the appellants.
Mr. Harry Gamble and Mr. R. G. Pleasant for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appeals dismissed without costs to either party (Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651; Board v. Glover, 161 U. S. 101), and cases remanded to'the. District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.