Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth D. De Lancey, Respondent, v. John P. Hawkins, Appellant, Impleaded with Elias D. Hunter et al., Respondents, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth D. De Lancey, Respondent, v. John P. Hawkins, Appellant, Impleaded with Elias D. Hunter et al., Respondents
163 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth D. De Lancey, Respondent, v. John P. Hawkins, Appellant, Impleaded with Elias D. Hunter et al., Respondents.
Be Lancey v. Hawkins, 23 App. Div. 8, affirmed.
(Argued May 10, 1900;
decided June 12, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 2, 1898, affirming a judgment entered upon a verdict directed by the court adjudging that the plaintiff and the defendants, other than Hawkins, are seized in fee and entitled to the recovery of the possession of certain lands under water.
Lawrence Kneelamd for appellant.
Walter D. Edmonds and John Hunter, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkee, Ch. J., G-bay, Babtlett, Maetin, Yann and Weeneb, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.