Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission et al., 1967 — 389 U.S. 894 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
389 U.S. 894·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 16, 1967.
No. 69.
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
Walter Herzfeld for petitioner.
Robert N. Katz for Federal Maritime Commission, Acting Solicitor General Spritzer for the United States, R. Frederic Fisher for Pacific Maritime Commission, and Owen Jameson for Marine Terminals Corp., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. (Certiorari granted, 388 U. S. 909.) Joint motion to remove case from summary calendar granted and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.