Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bell et al. v. Maryland, 1963 — 374 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
General
Bell et al. v. Maryland
374 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 167.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Defrick A. Bell, Jr. and Juanita Jackson Mitchell for petitioners. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Loring E. Hawes, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Bell et al. v. Maryland.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari granted.