Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Christina Kuhn, as Administratrix of Joseph Kuhn, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 683 · caselaw · US
General
Christina Kuhn, as Administratrix of Joseph Kuhn, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
153 N.Y. 683·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Christina Kuhn, as Administratrix of Joseph Kuhn, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
Kuhn v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 92 Hun, 74, affirmed.
(Argued June 18, 1897;
decided October 5, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 30, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William Kernan for appellant.
Cha/rles H. Bearle for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.