General
Tomey et ux. v. Lambdin; Tucker et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California; Seisman v. Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General of Maryland
562 U.S. 1269·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-8196.
No. 10-8228.
No. 10-8516.
Tomey et ux. v. Lambdin. Tucker et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California. Seisman v. Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General of Maryland.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. Sp. App. Md.;
C. A. 9th Cir.; and
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 28, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.