Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Butler v. Michigan, 1956 — 350 U.S. 963 · caselaw · US
General
Butler v. Michigan
350 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 548.
Butler v. Michigan.
Manuel Lee Bobbins and William G. Comb for appellant. Thomas M. Kavanagh, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Briefs of amici curiae urging that probable jurisdiction be noted were filed by Horace S. Manges for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., and Osmond K. Fraenkel for the Authors League of America, Inc.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Recorder's Court of the City of Detroit, Michigan. Probable jurisdiction noted.