Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SAYLES FINISHING PLANTS, INC., v. TOOMEY, TAX ASSESSOR, 1963 — 375 U.S. 9 · caselaw · US
Tax
SAYLES FINISHING PLANTS, INC., v. TOOMEY, TAX ASSESSOR
375 U.S. 9·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SAYLES FINISHING PLANTS, INC., v. TOOMEY, TAX ASSESSOR.
No. 188.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Frederick Bemays Wiener and Gerald W. Harrington for appellant.
Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.