Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 38 · caselaw · US
General
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES et al.
385 U.S. 38·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 496.
Decided November 7, 1966.
I. J. Grom-fine and Herman Sternstein for appellant in No. 496.
David Previant and Herbert S. Thatcher for appellants in No. 497.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. in both cases.
James E. Wilson and Warren Woods for American Buslines, Inc., and Robert J. Corber for National Association of Motor Bus Owners, appellees in No. 496.
William T. Croft for Overnite Transportation Co. et al., appellees in No. 497.
Together with No. 497, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.