General
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; and New York v. Illinois et al.
355 U.S. 909·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 2,
No. 3,
No. 4,
Original.
Original.
Original.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al. ; Michigan v. Illinois et al. ; and New York v. Illinois et al.
Stewart G. Honeck, Attorney General, and Roy G. Tulane, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Wisconsin, Miles Lord, Attorney General, and Melvin J. Peterson, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Minnesota, William Saxbe, Attorney General, and Robert E. Boyd, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Ohio, Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Pennsylvania, Thomas M. Kavanagh, Attorney General, Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, and Nicholas V. Olds, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Michigan, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, and John R. Davison, Solicitor General, for the State of New York, applicants-complainants.
[MAJORITY]
Applications having been made for a reopening and amendment or modification of the decree of April 21, 193P [281 U. S. 696], it is ordered that the defendants be allowed 45 days from the date of filing said applications in which to file a response or responses.