General
Baker et al. v. Grossjean et al.; and Blaydes et al. v. C. H. Little & Co. et al.
311 U.S. 618·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 356.
No. 399.
Baker et al. v. Grossjean et al.; and Blaydes et al. v. C. H. Little & Co. et al.
November 18, 1940.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Fidelity National Bank v. Swope, 274 U. S. 123, 130.
Mr. Horace C. Young for appellants. Mr. Nat Tipton for appellees.