Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burns, doing business as International Advertising Agency, v. Jaffe et al., 1958 — 358 U.S. 838 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Burns, doing business as International Advertising Agency, v. Jaffe et al.
358 U.S. 838·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 296.
Burns, doing business as International Advertising Agency, v. Jaffe et al.
Jay E. Darlington for petitioner. Claude A. Roth for Jaffe et al., and Hubert L. Will and Wayland B. Cedarquist for the Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Co. of Hammond, Indiana, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.