Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Elizabeth A. Burnham, Respondent, v. Abraham Denike, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Emil Mesnier, Respondent
167 N.Y. 623·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth A. Burnham, Respondent, v. Abraham Denike, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Emil Mesnier, Respondent.
(Argued June 5, 1901;
decided June 21, 1901.)
Burnham v. Denike, 54 App. Div. 628, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the' Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 18, 1900, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion of the respondent Mesnier to be relieved from his purchase of certain real property and granted such motion.
Raphael J. Moses for appellant.
Frederieh F. Grcme for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.