Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re WISE SHOES, Inc. Fifth Avenue Realty Corporation, Appellant, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In re WISE SHOES, Inc. Fifth Avenue Realty Corporation, Appellant
64 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re WISE SHOES, Inc. Fifth Avenue Realty Corporation, Appellant.
No. 359.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 3, 1933.
Pollock & Nemerov, of New York City (Henry W. Pollock and Maurice J. Dix, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
David W. Kahn and Nathan Friedman, both of New York City, for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order (2 F. Supp. 521) affirmed.