Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anne Mather, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. Mary Mather, Executrix, etc., Appellant, 1872 — 47 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
Anne Mather, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. Mary Mather, Executrix, etc., Appellant
47 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anne Mather, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. Mary Mather, Executrix, etc., Appellant.
(Decided January 23d, 1872.)
S. H. Thayer for appellant.
Burrill, Dmidson db Bu/rrill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree on stipulation to reverse judgment of Supreme Court and affirm decree of surrogate, without costs to either party against the other, pursuant to stipulation.