Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gart et al. v. Cole, Administrator, Federal Housing and Home Finance Agency, et al., 1959 — 359 U.S. 978 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Gart et al. v. Cole, Administrator, Federal Housing and Home Finance Agency, et al.
359 U.S. 978·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 771.
Gart et al. v. Cole, Administrator, Federal Housing and Home Finance Agency, et al.
Harris L. Present for petitioners.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assist~ant Attorney General Doub and Alan S. Rosenthal for •Cole. et al., Edward D. Burns, Porter R. Chandler and Martin Fogelman for Fordham University-, William Eldred Jackson and Rebecca M. Cutler for Lincoln Center for the Performing'Arts, Inc., Leo A. Larkin, Pauline K. Berger, Benjamin Offner and Anthony Curreri for Wagner et al., and Samuel I. Rosenman • and Max Freund for Webb & Knapp Lincoln Square Corporation, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.