Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Union Street Railway Company of Saginaw, Michigan, v. Snow, 1897 — 168 U.S. 706 · caselaw · US
General
Union Street Railway Company of Saginaw, Michigan, v. Snow
168 U.S. 706·Supreme Court of the United States·1897
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 467.
Union Street Railway Company of Saginaw, Michigan, v. Snow.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted November 15, 1897.
Decided December 6, 1897.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want'of. jurisdiction on the authority of Hm- derson Bridge Company v. Henderson City, 141 U. S. 679; Lehigh Water Company v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388; Sioux City Street Railway Company v. Sioux City, 138 U. S. 98 ; New Orleans City and Lake Railroad Company v. Louisiana, 157 U. S. 219.
Mr. George W. Weadock in' support of motions.