Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. v. Perkins et al., 1944 — 320 U.S. 803 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. v. Perkins et al.
320 U.S. 803·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 491.
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. v. Perkins et al.
January 3, 1944.
Messrs. W. H. Lawrence, Alfred Sutro, and Frauds R. Kirkham for petitioner. Messrs. Theodore J. Roche, Hiram W. Johnson, James Farraher, and Theodore H. Roche for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District, of California denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.