General
Bullock v. Rives, Superintendent
317 U.S. 627·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 165.
Bullock v. Rives, Superintendent.
October 12, 1942.
Mr. William J. O’Mahony for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost, Andrew F. Oehmann, and W. Marvin Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.