Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry S. Bogue et al., Respondents, v. William W. Newcomb et al., Appellants, 1874 — 58 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
Henry S. Bogue et al., Respondents, v. William W. Newcomb et al., Appellants
58 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry S. Bogue et al., Respondents, v. William W. Newcomb et al., Appellants.
(Argued September 25, 1874;
decided October 6, 1874.)
Reported below, 1 New York Supreme Court (T. & 0.), 251.
Isaac Lawson for the appellants.
Samuel Hand for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.