General
William H. Seymour et al., Appellants, v. Morris Rindskopf et al., Respondents
116 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Seymour et al., Appellants, v. Morris Rindskopf et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 9, 1889;
decided November 26, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 15, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury.
Charles E. Hughes for appellants.
Nathaniel Myers for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
•Agree to affirm on opinion of Bbown, J., in JBernhei/mer v. Bindslcopff {ante, 428).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.