Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dunne et al. v. United States, 1943 — 320 U.S. 790 · caselaw · US
General
Dunne et al. v. United States
320 U.S. 790·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 431.
Dunne et al. v. United States.
November 22, 1943.
Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Edward G. Jennings for the United States. Mr. Arthur Garfield Hays filed a brief on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.