Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cornelia T. Terry, Respondent, v. Katharine T. Moore, Appellant, Impleaded with Clement C. Moore, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
Cornelia T. Terry, Respondent, v. Katharine T. Moore, Appellant, Impleaded with Clement C. Moore
149 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cornelia T. Terry, Respondent, v. Katharine T. Moore, Appellant, Impleaded with Clement C. Moore.
Terry v. Moore, 6 Misc. Rep. 635, affirmed.
(Argued April 27, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made May 10, 1894, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and also affirmed an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint and an interlocutory judgment entered thereon.
Charles Edward Souther for appellant.
Flamen B. Candler and John M. Buckingham for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.