Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chatz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Armour Plant Employees Credit Union; and Chatz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Todd et al., 1946 — 329 U.S. 728 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Chatz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Armour Plant Employees Credit Union; and Chatz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Todd et al.
329 U.S. 728·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 321.
No. 322.
Chatz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Armour Plant Employees Credit Union; and Chatz, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Todd et al.
October 14, 1946.
Joseph Rosenbaum, for petitioner. Ray E. Lane for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Reported below: 154 F. 2d 236.