General
County of Los Angeles et al. v. Montrose Chemical Corp. of California
386 U.S. 1004·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 982.
County of Los Angeles et al. v. Montrose Chemical Corp. of California.
Harold W. Kennedy and John Geyer Tausig for petitioners. James J. Arditto for respondent. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, J'ohn J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James E. Sabine and Ernest P. Goodman, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State, of California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Dist. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.