Torts · MBE-tested
Timothy McMahon, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 577·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Timothy McMahon, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
McMahon v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 119 App. Div. 927, affirmed.
(Argued May 25, 1908;
decided June 9, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of - the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May-18, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendants negligence.
Frederick Collin for appellant.
Thomas E. Courtney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.