Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Commissioners of the State Reservation at Niagara, to take certain lands, 1886 — 102 N.Y. 734 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the Commissioners of the State Reservation at Niagara, to take certain lands
102 N.Y. 734·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Commissioners of the State Reservation at Niagara, to take certain lands.
(Argued June 15, 1886 ;
decided June 22, 1886)
This was a motion from an order of General Term which" affirmed the report of commissioners of appraisement, appointed under and in pursuance of chapter 336, Laws of 1883.
The following is the mem. of opinion:
“We think we are concluded by the decisions under the General Railroad Act from entertaining this appeal. There is no such difference between the language of that act and the language of the act under which these proceedings were instituted as to require or authorize a different construction of the two acts. There is no public policy and no reason for authorizing appeals to this court under the one act which do not apply to the other. Decisions which have been so long and uniformly adhered to should not now be departed from or disregarded.
“ The appeal should be dismissed.”
Ansley Wilcox for motion.
Galvin FrOst opposed.
[MAJORITY — Per Guriam mem.]
Per Guriam mem.
for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.