Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHRYSLER SALES CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. DETROIT MOTOR APPLIANCE COMPANY, 1931 — 49 F.2d 1074 · caselaw · US
Corporations
CHRYSLER SALES CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. DETROIT MOTOR APPLIANCE COMPANY
49 F.2d 1074·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHRYSLER SALES CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. DETROIT MOTOR APPLIANCE COMPANY.
No. 9069.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Feb. 2, 1931.
J. King Harness, of Detroit,. Mich., for appellant.
C. B. Belknap, of Detroit, Mich., and M. M. Moore, Richard Paul, and A. C. Paul, all of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.